phishin fool said:So, if you move to Oregon and fish a lot, it costs a lot of money to fish until you're there for six months? That hyardly seems fair...
eugene1 said:It's really pretty cheap in the overall scheme of things. Less than a buck a day or so??
As to your fairness notion... I think it is fair as it costs about the same for an OR resident to buy a license in CA as it will for you to buy one in Oregon.
Have you heard of the expression "even steven"
phishin fool said:I'm not trying to be argumentative. I'm simply looking at the logic these rules fail to utilize...
:worthy: :harhar:DrTheopolis said:Us 3-percenters are pretty snobby about it, too.
Unless your Native American, were all transplants. I'd consider you a 'wild born' fish, but not a native...DrTheopolis said:Transplants (regardless whether they insult us Natives by calling themselves "Oregonians") have contributed nothing to maintaining the resource. Just as I've done nothing to enhance the resources in California.
Just playing a little Devil's Advocate here.
troutmasta said:Unless your Native American, were all transplants. I'd consider you a 'wild born' fish, but not a native...