S
Senko86
You are grasping at straws and make conclusions about my opinions without knowing. First I do not like people illegally introducing fish it pisses me off they can mess with a fishery I have not once praised the idiot that did the dumping in the first place. This is not a matter of them being illegally introduced this is a matter of they are there and they need to be handled. I have not once said these fisheries are thriving due to that bass try actually reading my posts. Please tell me a reasonable way to remove the bass. Right now the bass being removed are the large ones leaving the smaller ones behind which in turn selects the smaller fish genetics resulting in fisheries like the John Day and Umpqua river that are overrun with 10" fish the push out the trout. This is what the regulation is trying to prevent by promoting a well managed population that would not do further damage to the fishery more than what has already been done. I don't think you realize that this proposed regulation would actually help protect the trout fishery from further damage. If you really want to get into it the browns kill more rainbows than the bass so I guess if you want a pure lake you need to kill them all off too. The fish are there the question is are you going to let your ideas of bass needing to be killed not only ruin a great bass fishery but also potentially damage the trout fishery your are trying to protect. Lets just ruin everyones fishing cause thats what this mentality results in. We all love to fish lets protect what is left to protect and not dwell on the past that cannot be changed.