R
rainman
OnTheFly said:That's hilarious!:lol: Reminds me of a redneck joke about grandma wanting ammo for Christmas.:lol:
Is this the same grandma that got ran over by a reindeer ?? :lol:
OnTheFly said:That's hilarious!:lol: Reminds me of a redneck joke about grandma wanting ammo for Christmas.:lol:
OnTheFly said:My concern would be the lowlifes. Plenty of dense forest out there to hide a body.
TTFishon said:Well I've had scary encounters with animals and people. I think a gun would have helped with at least two of the animal encounters but I don't think it would have turned out so well with the human encounters. You start pointing a gun and it kind of ups the ante.
I almost forgot to answer your question. Yes I am concerned for my safety. I have social anxiety issues so if I can help it I usually try to avoid anyone I happen to see.
Markcanby said:Second don't shoot to wound! Wounded men can testify.
I don't shoot to kill either, 2 in the chest... one in the head.... if they die from these wounds... bummerchris61182 said:Though you don't shoot to kill either, you shoot to stop the threat. Now what ever that means is another story .
halibuthitman said:I don't shoot to kill either, 2 in the chest... one in the head.... if they die from these wounds... bummer
SNDSLGR said:I agree, I was just having some fun with the scenerio. Remember also that Oregon is an open carry state, no need to conceal anything though while in the local 7-11 may not be a great idea standing on a river it would be totally acceptable... and a sidearm in plain view would stop any of these "friendly" encounters I am sure.