D
DirectDrive
Yikes where is that ? Do not want.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, most snakes are not that fast and they don't want to be around us at all.Snakes are not on the top of my scares me list in Oregon-
Its...
Cougars (both species)
Drunk Drivers
Hippies....
In that order.
I lol'd and then I realized I'm the one with dreads...Have you seen Chez' pic?
Have a little sensitivity.
I lol'd and then I realized I'm the one with dreads...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I agree with you, Jeanna. I prefer the developed sites, myself. I just figured I would toss the idea of undeveloped areas out there for consideration.I for one am not inclined to camp in undeveloped areas for a number of reasons, Quinn is a good campground and has good access, as does rock creek or whatever it's called.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I for one am not inclined to camp in undeveloped areas for a number of reasons, Quinn is a good campground and has good access, as does rock creek or whatever it's called.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I agree with you, Jeanna. I prefer the developed sites, myself. I just figured I would toss the idea of undeveloped areas out there for consideration.
Snakes are not on the top of my scares me list in Oregon-
Its...
Cougars (both species)
Drunk Drivers
Hippies....
In that order.
9. We're new at fishing. And RVing. And camping. So if this is not at a developed campground, that means boondocking, or dry camping, in the parlance of our times. We've never done that, but I think we could swing 3 days living off the fresh water tank, batteries, and propane. But developed campsites are more our thing you know ?
So in summation I would vote for developed campsites at a lake with bank fishing in walking distance from the campsite and NO SNAKES.