Raincatcher said:
I agree with you, Jeanna. I prefer the developed sites, myself. I just figured I would toss the idea of undeveloped areas out there for consideration.
So. Me and Mrs. P are quite interested. But we gotta coupla prollems.
1. We both have kayaks. But we're not rigged to kayak for fishing whilst leaving the dogs at the campground.
2. We got a RV. Trailer. That's what keeps us from bringing the kayaks.
4. She doesn't fish. I mean, she likes fish. She likes the IDEA of fishing. But she lets me do the fishing, so long as she isn't left behind. That means when we go camping, I don't fish, and I definitely don't kayak fish when RV camping.
4. So, she could be left behind with the dogs, while I go fishing with the fun kids, particularly if they have a boat that they'll let me on. But I'll hear about it later because she was left behind. Alone. With the dogs.
5. If there was bank fishing nearby the camping, she'd be happy to have me fish there, and maybe come visit with the dogs along the way.
6. But if the fishing is no-bank, only boat, that doesn't work.
7. Or if there were others hanging out around the campgrounds keeping each other company.
8. But if there are snakes around, she'll freak. And the dogs are stupid and will get bit. So...
9. We're new at fishing. And RVing. And camping. So if this is not at a developed campground, that means boondocking, or dry camping, in the parlance of our times. We've never done that, but I think we could swing 3 days living off the fresh water tank, batteries, and propane. But developed campsites are more our thing you know ?
So in summation I would vote for developed campsites at a lake with bank fishing in walking distance from the campsite and NO SNAKES.
