S
Senkosam
Member
Making lures has been as important to me as much as fishing.
1. I can test theories regarding combinations of lure shape/ action/ size/ color
2. I can disprove much of the media crap that's not worth the air time or paper meant to sell lures but labeled as undeniable (kinda like political B.S.)
Anyone can buy stuff to make almost any lure from bass jigs to crankbaits to finesse soft plastics. But what about all the bags of soft plastics you have stored in the basement (like me) for over 15 years? I used to buy more crap I didn't need or would stop casting after one season. Who says anglers aren't fickle?!
Granted, classic lures from Mr Twister, Strike King and others have earned their product status as go-to. But my pocket book limits me from buying and testing new and old lures I don't have. I got bored catching fish on the same lures year after year so I started using my imagination to make and test unique combinations.
So, one day while smoking my pipe (tobacco FYI, watching TV in said basement, I looked at the soft plastics hanging in neat rows on the wall and thought, 'what part of one lure would do well joined to a part of another?' Many times we've seen when lure companies come out with a slight variation of a lure design and make big bucks selling it as something unique and superior at catching fish. Message to lure companies: NONSENSE! The action parts of lures haven't changed much in 50 years. These include curly tails, flat straight tails, spike tails, split tails and swimbait (Sassy Shad) tails. But one thing that hasn't changed much is body texture and shapes. Does it matter to fish? All I know is that fish strike my Frankenstein creations. (BTW, my name is Frank ; ) )
Better yet, others who have cast those creations have also done well with them.
Here are a few that anyone can make using a candle to slightly melt the ends of the parts to be joined.
The rectangular French Fry stick has a unique texture and many lure tail shapes can be joined to it:
1. I can test theories regarding combinations of lure shape/ action/ size/ color
2. I can disprove much of the media crap that's not worth the air time or paper meant to sell lures but labeled as undeniable (kinda like political B.S.)
Anyone can buy stuff to make almost any lure from bass jigs to crankbaits to finesse soft plastics. But what about all the bags of soft plastics you have stored in the basement (like me) for over 15 years? I used to buy more crap I didn't need or would stop casting after one season. Who says anglers aren't fickle?!
Granted, classic lures from Mr Twister, Strike King and others have earned their product status as go-to. But my pocket book limits me from buying and testing new and old lures I don't have. I got bored catching fish on the same lures year after year so I started using my imagination to make and test unique combinations.
So, one day while smoking my pipe (tobacco FYI, watching TV in said basement, I looked at the soft plastics hanging in neat rows on the wall and thought, 'what part of one lure would do well joined to a part of another?' Many times we've seen when lure companies come out with a slight variation of a lure design and make big bucks selling it as something unique and superior at catching fish. Message to lure companies: NONSENSE! The action parts of lures haven't changed much in 50 years. These include curly tails, flat straight tails, spike tails, split tails and swimbait (Sassy Shad) tails. But one thing that hasn't changed much is body texture and shapes. Does it matter to fish? All I know is that fish strike my Frankenstein creations. (BTW, my name is Frank ; ) )
Better yet, others who have cast those creations have also done well with them.
Here are a few that anyone can make using a candle to slightly melt the ends of the parts to be joined.
The rectangular French Fry stick has a unique texture and many lure tail shapes can be joined to it:
Last edited: