M
markasd
What completely pissed me off is that you asked for an opinion, then totally disregarded anyones input before you heard it! Why did you even ask?
I would be more proud to said i catch a nice big fat wild trout (pretty hard to catch one at the lower river)than saying a got a skinny little baby steelhead!!!
I would be more proud to said i catch a nice big fat wild trout (pretty hard to catch one at the lower river)than saying a got a skinny little baby steelhead!!!
You missed the entire meaning of my post.
What completely pissed me off is that you asked for an opinion, then totally disregarded anyones input before you heard it! Why did you even ask? :think:
Learning quite a bit about you as well Van!
We all know you caught a steelhead on a bass lure....but that wasn't a real steelhead because you caught it on a bass lure and were not targeting steelhead. But...because you caught this particular fish using a proven steelhead catching technique so this fish becomes a steelhead? Would it have been more of a trout if you would have been nymphing with an indicator and a 5wt.? :lol: Is that what this is really about? Did you want someone to praise you for catching the fish on the swing? Or the fly? a lot of this seems to be coming back to the method of the catch in your posts! :think:
Nice job Van!!! Put one over on those gear tossers!
well you are getting views from a scientific viewpoint and a legal viewpoint... which not suprisingly are a bit different than each other. what science deems as a steelhead versus what the law determines a steelhead has two completely different purposes. by legal definition since the clack is in the willamette zone that is a trout. scientifically it COULD be a steelhead but without testing for the presence of salt. who knows... just pure speculation
now i wouldnt judge anyone because of this topic and the way it went. you asked a question without regard to which definition. like i said before legally it is not a steelhead but scientifically it could be. a lot of people answered it by legal definition.
Now to end this on a not so jackassery note. Regardless its a nice beautiful fish. enjoy the catch.
Obviously you're wrong. Its a Steelhead.Am I the only one that thinks this fish looks like a Cut?
Am I the only one that thinks this fish looks like a Cut?
Am I the only one that thinks this fish looks like a Cut?
not just on this forum, probably in the whole state of oregon LOL that looks aboslutely nothing like a cutthroat
Thats possible there is a run of cuts in the clackamas!!
Im done argued out....but....
look at the cuts in Brandons threads. The spots extend much lower onto the body than on this fish.