W
wormosa
If you guys think that is bad, just look at the price for a non-resident license.
It is still cheaper than a lot of states, and Oregon has way better fishing than a lot of places.
I am excited that they added the 2nd pole rule, we can now fish with two poles! It is this way in California and it is nice to have double the chance of hooking a fish.
Yeah but it's kinda lame...I can fish in washington, which has way better fishing in some places than Oregon, for less as a non resident, than I can as a resident here..I think that's a bit messed up. And the two pole thing, it's only for lakes and reservoirs, so, I mean, usually we have 4 or more rods in the water as it is so adding double would be chaos I think. But I can see how it would be advantageous for some.
they should just let you fish with 2 poles compared to what charging 15.00 more?It is still cheaper than a lot of states, and Oregon has way better fishing than a lot of places.
I am excited that they added the 2nd pole rule, we can now fish with two poles! It is this way in California and it is nice to have double the chance of hooking a fish.
they should just let you fish with 2 poles compared to what charging 15.00 more?
so do i have to get a permit for my boat even if tags are good ( they expire in 2011) ? i thought i do and i have to get one every year right? i just read it is a $97 fine if you do not have one, what a joke