B
bubs
plumbertom;n605530 said:https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=491
There should be no shad in the archaeological record of the PNW.
bubs;n605535 said:Archaeologists study records from all time periods of human history, and most of us in the US consider anything 50 years or older as at least having potential significance under federal and other regulations. She's studying excavated collections from the turn of the century, late 1800s to early 1900s.
Now that that's cleared up, anyone have a fish they could trade?